PANYNJ Marine Terminals — Financial Profile
Port Authority of New York and New Jersey
Largest East Coast Port Complex — Consolidated Bond Credit Analysis
Prepared by DWU AI
An AI Product of DWU Consulting LLC
February 2026
DWU Consulting LLC provides specialized municipal finance consulting for transportation agencies, airports, ports, toll roads, and water utilities. Our infrastructure finance expertise spans revenue forecasting, bond structuring, rate analysis, and capital program advisory. Please visit https://dwuconsulting.com
Important Disclaimer: This article is generated by artificial intelligence and provided for informational purposes only. It should not be construed as legal advice, investment advice, or financial guidance. Port authorities, investors, and policymakers should consult qualified legal, financial, and technical advisors before making decisions based on this content. DWU Consulting does not provide personalized investment, legal, or tax advice through this article.
Entity financial data: Sourced from the port authority's published ACFR, official statements, and EMMA continuing disclosures. Figures reflect reported data as of the fiscal years cited; current figures may differ.
Credit ratings: Referenced from published rating agency reports. Ratings are point-in-time; verify current ratings before reliance.
Operational statistics: Based on port-published cargo volumes, vessel calls, and operational reports. Cargo data is subject to revision.
Governance and organizational information: Based on publicly available port authority enabling legislation, board records, and organizational documents.
Analysis and commentary: DWU Consulting analysis. Port finance is an expanding area of DWU's practice; independent verification of specific figures against primary source documents is recommended.
Changelog
2026-02-23 — Initial publication. Covers PANYNJ marine terminal structure, consolidated bond framework ($24.7B outstanding), 5 terminal areas, ExpressRail, 251st Series bonds (Feb 2026), and key analytical considerations for investors analyzing PANYNJ consolidated credit.PANYNJ Update (February 2026): The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey priced its 251st Series Consolidated Bonds on February 12, 2026 — $350 million in new-money and refunding bonds with maturities from 2037 to 2056 at coupons of 5.00%-5.25%. This issuance reflects the Authority's ongoing capital program across all facilities. The PANYNJ consolidated credit carries AA-/Aa3/AA- ratings (all Stable). Marine terminal revenues represent approximately 5.6% of total consolidated revenue ($387.6M of $6.9B in FY2024), with the dominant revenue sources being bridge/tunnel tolls (29%) and airport fees (25%). The port complex handles approximately 7.8 million TEUs annually across 5 terminal areas, making it the largest container port complex on the U.S. East Coast. Brooklyn/Red Hook terminal is being transferred to NYCEDC in a land swap. General Reserve Fund totals approximately $2.634 billion as of September 30, 2025.
Introduction
The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey (PANYNJ) presents a unique analytical challenge in U.S. port finance: it is simultaneously the operator of the largest container port complex on the U.S. East Coast and one of the most complex multi-modal public authorities in the world. Its bonds — Consolidated Bonds secured by revenues from ALL Authority facilities — cannot be analyzed as pure port revenue bonds. Rather, they represent claims on a diversified infrastructure enterprise that includes three major airports (JFK, EWR, LGA), the largest bridge and tunnel complex in the New York metro area, the PATH commuter rail system, the World Trade Center, and the marine terminals themselves.
For analysts focused on port credit specifically, this consolidation is both a strength and a source of complexity. It is a strength because port revenue volatility is diversified by the much larger and more stable bridge/tunnel toll and airport fee revenue streams. It is a complexity because port metrics alone (DSCR, TEU throughput, DCOH) are not meaningful for PANYNJ bond analysis — the consolidated picture must be assessed.
PANYNJ's marine terminals handle approximately 7.8 million TEUs annually, serving as the primary container gateway for the New York metropolitan area (population 20+ million) and a substantial share of the broader Northeast U.S. market. The Bayonne Bridge navigational clearance project (completed 2019) — raising clearance from 151 to 215 feet — was a transformational infrastructure investment enabling post-Panamax and New Panamax vessels to reach Newark and Elizabeth terminals, positioning PANYNJ for the next generation of mega-vessel service.
Authority Overview
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Full Legal Name | The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey |
| Created | 1921 by interstate compact between New York and New Jersey, consented to by U.S. Congress |
| Governance | 12-member Board of Commissioners: 6 appointed by NY Governor, 6 by NJ Governor; 6-year overlapping terms |
| Port District | ~25-mile radius from Statue of Liberty; portions of both NY and NJ |
| Fiscal Year | Calendar year (January 1 – December 31) |
| Bond Counsel | Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP |
| Financial Advisor | Public Financial Management (PFM) |
| Trustee | U.S. Bank Trust Company, National Association |
Marine Terminal Facilities
PANYNJ operates five marine terminal areas in the Port District, collectively serving as the largest container port complex on the U.S. East Coast and the third-largest in the nation by volume.
| Terminal | Location | Acres | Key Features |
|---|---|---|---|
| Port Newark | Newark, NJ | 930 | Container/break-bulk; 3 berths (Port Newark Container Terminal); intermodal rail |
| Elizabeth-Port Authority Marine Terminal (EPAMT) | Elizabeth, NJ | 1,257 | Largest terminal; 7 berths across 3 operators (Maher, APM, PNCT); ExpressRail Elizabeth |
| Port Jersey | Jersey City, NJ | 341 | Container (Global Container Terminals); auto processing (Hyundai Glovis) |
| Howland Hook Marine Terminal | Staten Island, NY | 311 | Container (Global Container Terminals); ExpressRail Staten Island |
| Greenville Yard | Jersey City, NJ | 32 | Rail barge facility; NY New Jersey Rail LLC |
ExpressRail System: PANYNJ's competitive advantage in intermodal freight is its ExpressRail network — on-dock rail facilities connecting directly to the national Class I rail system (CSX and Norfolk Southern) at multiple terminals. ExpressRail Elizabeth (250 acres at EPAMT) and ExpressRail Port Newark (150 acres) together represent one of the largest port intermodal rail facilities on the East Coast. ExpressRail Staten Island connects via the Arthur Kill Lift Bridge. This infrastructure allows containers to transfer directly from ship to rail car without trucking, reducing drayage costs and transit times for cargo destined to points beyond the New York metro area.
Port Net Book Value: PANYNJ's marine terminal net capital asset value totals approximately $2.702 billion, distributed across Port Newark ($748.6M), EPAMT ($855.2M), Howland Hook ($398.8M), Port Jersey ($461.4M), Greenville Yard and related facilities ($178.0M), and Brooklyn/Red Hook ($59.9M, being transferred to NYCEDC).
Consolidated Bond Structure
Critical Analytical Note: PANYNJ issues Consolidated Bonds that represent a general obligation of the entire Authority, pledging revenues from ALL facilities — airports, bridges/tunnels, PATH, WTC, marine terminals, and bus terminals. There are no standalone port revenue bonds. Marine terminal revenues flow into the consolidated pool and represent approximately 5.6% of total gross revenue ($387.6M of $6.9B in FY2024).
| Feature | Detail |
|---|---|
| Security | Full faith and credit of Authority; Consolidated Bonds pledge revenues from ALL facilities |
| Outstanding (Feb 2026) | ~$24.673 billion (251 series since inception) |
| Additional Bonds Test | 1.3x coverage of MADS on all outstanding and proposed Consolidated Bonds |
| General Reserve Fund | ~$2.634 billion statutory minimum (as of Sept 30, 2025) |
| Commercial Paper | Up to $750M authorized (Series A/B/C) |
| Consolidated Bond Ratings | S&P AA- / Moody's Aa3 / Fitch AA- — all Stable |
| 251st Series (Feb 2026) | $350M; coupons 5.00%-5.25%; maturities 2037-2056; capital projects + refunding |
Consolidated Financial Overview
| Revenue Source | FY 2024 ($000s) | % of Total |
|---|---|---|
| Rentals (primarily WTC, real estate) | $2,363,621 | 34% |
| Bridge & Tunnel Tolls | $2,015,934 | 29% |
| Aviation Fees (JFK, EWR, LGA) | $1,719,025 | 25% |
| Parking / Other | $530,812 | 8% |
| Utilities | $154,505 | 2% |
| PATH Fares | $152,461 | 2% |
| Port Department Revenue | $387,633 | 5.6% |
| Total Gross Operating Revenue | $6,936,358 | 100% |
Investor Implication: For bond investors, PANYNJ consolidated bonds are primarily supported by bridge/tunnel toll revenue (~29%) and aviation fees (~25%) — not marine terminal revenues, which represent only 5.6% of total. Port volume risk is substantially diluted in the consolidated structure. A 50% decline in container throughput revenue would reduce total consolidated revenue by only 2.8%, making port-specific trade disruption relatively immaterial to bond debt service coverage.
Credit Analysis
Strengths: (1) Diversified consolidated revenue — toll roads, airports, WTC rentals, and marine terminals provide multi-sector credit support that no single-facility issuer can match. (2) AA-/Aa3/AA- ratings reflect the strength of the consolidated credit. (3) Bayonne Bridge clearance investment positions the port for mega-vessel service. (4) ExpressRail intermodal system provides competitive advantage vs. southern East Coast ports. (5) Dominant NY metro market position — 20M+ person market anchor. (6) $2.634B General Reserve Fund provides liquidity buffer. (7) 251 series of bond issuance history demonstrates consistent capital market access.
Risks: (1) Largest non-federal bond issuer in US — $24.7B outstanding debt is the largest obligation of any public authority aside from the U.S. government. Coverage ratios are acceptable but not exceptional. (2) Bi-state governance complexity — Governor veto authority over Board minutes creates political risk absent from single-state authorities. (3) NYC real estate concentration — Rental revenue (34% of total) is concentrated in World Trade Center and related real estate, creating exposure to NYC commercial real estate cycles. (4) PATH operating subsidy — PATH transit loses money and absorbs Authority resources. (5) Capital program scale — ongoing multi-billion investment across all facilities requires continuous capital market access. (6) Port Department income declining: $78M in FY2024 vs. $101M in FY2023 vs. $139M in FY2022 — worth monitoring.