Port of Oakland — Financial Profile
Port of Oakland — Component Unit of the City of Oakland
West Coast's Only Integrated Aviation-Maritime-Real Estate Revenue Bond
Update — February 2026: Fitch's Positive outlook (July 2024) signals potential upgrade to A+ or higher, reflecting strong liquidity and diversified revenue base. Port of Oakland designated as NorCal ZERO hydrogen hub with $53M active fuel cell truck deployment (30 Class 8 vehicles). Federal Terminal Modernization Grant ($50M, 2023) and 5-year $1.4B capital plan underway. Jan 2025 container volumes +8.5% YoY despite CY2024 preliminary count of ~900K TEUs.
AI-Generated Content Disclaimer: This article is generated by artificial intelligence and is intended for educational and informational purposes only. It is not legal, financial, or investment advice. Readers should consult qualified professionals before making any financial or legal decisions. The Port of Oakland is a public entity; financial data is sourced from publicly filed documents, EMMA, and official port disclosures.
2026-02-23 — Initial publication. Entity profile covering FY2024 financials, bond structure, capital program, and credit analysis.
Introduction
The Port of Oakland is a unique West Coast infrastructure operator: the only major Pacific Coast port that integrates aviation (Oakland International Airport), maritime (deep-water container terminals), commercial real estate (Jack London Square, Airport Business Park), and municipal utilities (electric utility for port-owned facilities) under a single unified revenue bond pledge.
This integrated structure is both a credit strength and a complexity. While the four-division revenue base insulates the port from single-sector volatility — maritime downturns are partially offset by aviation or real estate stability — it also requires rigorous financial management across fundamentally different business units.
As of February 2026, the Port of Oakland holds Fitch A+ Senior Lien ratings with a Positive outlook, signaling a potential upgrade to AA- or higher. This is noteworthy given the container shipping volatility that plagued West Coast ports in 2024. The port's $849.2 million in unrestricted current assets and disciplined capital planning position it well for the next decade of energy transition and supply chain restructuring.
Entity Overview
Governance & Leadership
The Port of Oakland is a component unit of the City of Oakland, California, operating under exclusive control provisions in the City Charter. Governance is vested in a Board of Port Commissioners consisting of seven members appointed by the City Council (nominated by the Mayor, 4-year terms, unpaid). The board appoints the Executive Director, who serves as chief executive and is responsible for day-to-day operations.
Current leadership:
- Executive Director: Kristi McKenney (appointed February 14, 2025)
- Chief Financial Officer: Julie Lam
- Fiscal Year End: June 30 (aligned with City of Oakland)
As a City component unit, the Port's financials roll into the City's Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR). However, the Port maintains separate financial statements audited under the Single Audit Act (federal compliance for ports receiving federal grants).
Operating Divisions
The Port of Oakland operates four legally distinct but financially consolidated business units:
| Division | Revenue Mix (FY24) | Key Operations |
|---|---|---|
| Aviation | ~47% | Oakland International Airport (OAK); medium-hub; O&D-focused (70%+ originating/destination) |
| Maritime | ~25–30% | 10 container terminals; 20 deep-water berths; 35 cranes; ~900K TEUs (CY24); 9th largest US container port |
| Real Estate | ~15–18% | Jack London Square (90%+ occupied); Airport Business Park; 875+ acres waterfront mixed-use |
| Port Utilities | ~5–8% | Municipal electric utility serving port-owned and tenant facilities; meter revenue |
Aviation Division
Oakland International Airport is classified as a medium-hub airport (per FAA CY 2024 passenger boarding data: 31 large hubs, 27 medium hubs). The airport is heavily oriented toward originating/destination (O&D) traffic rather than connections, which provides more stable yield but lower volume than a major hub-and-spoke system. OAK has benefited from Bay Area demand and cargo capacity but faces capacity constraints that make expansion challenging in a seismically active region.
Maritime Division
The Port of Oakland is the 9th largest container port in the United States and the 4th largest on the Pacific Coast, behind Los Angeles, Long Beach, and Seattle. The port handled approximately 900,000 TEUs (twenty-foot equivalent units) in calendar year 2024, a significant decline from 1,083,245 TEUs in 2023 — reflecting the broader West Coast container market softness and shipper consolidation at larger gateway ports.
However, January 2025 showed +8.5% container volume growth month-over-month, suggesting potential stabilization or recovery. The port's trade composition in 2024 was dominated by Asia (74%), followed by Europe (17%), domestic Hawaii (5%), Australia/New Zealand (3%), and other origins (1%).
Major terminal operators include SSA Marine (OICT), TRAPAC Oakland, and SSA Terminals. Both BNSF and Union Pacific operate intermodal rail yards at the port, providing dual-rail connectivity and direct freeway access (I-80/I-680 corridors).
Real Estate Division
Jack London Square, the port's flagship mixed-use development, is over 90% occupied and has become a destination for offices, hotels, retail, and entertainment. The Airport Business Park and 875+ acres of waterfront property under port control provide long-term development upside, particularly given Bay Area real estate demand and environmental sustainability focus (ARCHES clean energy hub designation).
Financial Summary
FY 2024 Operating Results
| Metric | Amount ($ millions) |
|---|---|
| Total Operating Revenue | $407.7 |
| Total Operating Expenses | $389.5 |
| Operating Margin | ~4.5% |
| Unrestricted Current Assets | $849.2 |
| FY2024 Capital Budget | $163.7 |
Liquidity & Asset Position
The Port of Oakland's liquidity position is exceptionally strong. With $849.2 million in unrestricted current assets against $389.5 million in annual operating expenses, the port maintains nearly 2.2 years of operating expense coverage — far above rating agency benchmarks for A-rated entities (typically 100–180 days). This fortress balance sheet is a major credit strength and a key driver of Fitch's Positive outlook.
Capital Program
FY2024 capital expenditures were $163.7 million, representing a +45.6% increase from the prior year. The Port has adopted a 5-year capital plan (2025–2030) totaling $1.4 billion, focused on terminal modernization, environmental compliance (clean equipment, shore power, electrification), and aviation runway/taxiway improvements.
Bond Structure & Debt
Unique Two-Tier Pledge
The Port of Oakland's revenue bond structure is unusual in that all four divisions (maritime, aviation, real estate, utilities) pledge their net operating revenues to the same bond series. This is not the case at most large ports, which typically have separate pledges for maritime and aviation or issue subordinate lien bonds.
The port's debt is structured in a two-tier lien arrangement:
- Senior Lien Bonds: First claim on all consolidated net operating revenues
- Intermediate Lien Bonds: Second claim on all consolidated net operating revenues (junior to Senior Lien but senior to any future unsecured debt)
Outstanding Debt (as of FY2024)
- Total Outstanding Debt: ~$458 million
- Senior Lien Bonds: ~$253 million
- Intermediate Lien Bonds: ~$205 million
Credit Ratings
| Rating Agency | Lien Class | Rating | Outlook / Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fitch | Senior Lien | A+ | Positive (July 2024) |
| Fitch | Intermediate Lien | A | Positive (July 2024) |
| Moody's | Senior Lien | A1 | Stable (Dec 2024) |
| S&P | Senior Lien | Not Rated | — |
Refinancing History
In December 2020 through February 2021, the Port executed a major refinancing of $544 million in outstanding debt, achieving approximately $87 million in net present value (NPV) savings. This refinancing demonstrated both the port's market access and disciplined financial management during favorable interest rate conditions.
Capital Program & Infrastructure
5-Year Capital Plan (2025–2030)
The Port of Oakland has adopted a $1.4 billion capital plan focused on four key pillars:
- Federal Terminal Modernization Grant ($50 million): Awarded in 2023 to fund container terminal equipment upgrades and berth improvements for vessel accommodation and throughput efficiency.
- NorCal ZERO Hydrogen Hub ($53 million): Active deployment of 30 Class 8 fuel cell trucks for terminal and drayage operations. Oakland is one of the first North American container ports to operationalize hydrogen fuel cell equipment at scale. This positions the port as a sustainability leader and satisfies California CARB (California Air Resources Board) mandates.
- Shore Power / Cold-Ironing: Infrastructure to allow vessels at berth to plug into shore power, eliminating emissions from auxiliary engines. Ongoing implementation across terminals.
- Terminal Electrification: Conversion of older cargo handling equipment (rail-mounted gantries, reach stackers) to electric or zero-emission powertrains.
- Aviation Improvements: Runway and taxiway modernization at Oakland International Airport to support aircraft weight limits and operational efficiency.
- Oakland Army Base Redevelopment: Long-term mixed-use development on 363 acres of port-controlled waterfront property. Plans are still in development.
The $163.7 million FY2024 capital spend reflects this aggressive modernization agenda. The port's strong liquidity and Positive outlook from Fitch suggest capacity to fund this capital program without unduly stretching debt service coverage ratios.
Competitive Position
West Coast Gateway
Oakland ranks 4th on the Pacific Coast (behind Los Angeles, Long Beach, and Seattle) and 9th nationally in container volume. However, the port maintains distinct competitive advantages:
- Natural Deepwater Harbor: 50+ feet of natural depth with less dredging than LA/Long Beach. This reduces long-term maintenance capital and operational complexity.
- Dual Class I Rail Access: Both BNSF and Union Pacific intermodal yards serve the port, enabling direct rail connectivity across North America without transshipment through LA/Long Beach.
- Freeway Connectivity: Direct I-80/I-680 access minimizes dray truck congestion compared to LA/Long Beach's port complex.
- Northern California's Primary Container Gateway: The Port of Oakland anchors a $174 billion annual regional economic impact and supports 98,345 jobs across Northern California, the Central Valley, and the Sierra Nevada.
Container Volume Dynamics
CY2024 preliminary container volume of ~900,000 TEUs represents a decline from 1,083,245 TEUs in CY2023, reflecting West Coast market weakness driven by shipper consolidation (volume shift to LA/Long Beach and Seattle) and supply chain normalization post-COVID. However, January 2025 showed +8.5% growth, suggesting potential stabilization.
The port faces ongoing competitive pressure from larger West Coast gateways, particularly LA/Long Beach (over 10 times Oakland's scale). Long-term volume recovery depends on supply chain diversification, Northern California economic growth, and shipper preference for lower-congestion gateways.
Credit Analysis
Credit Strengths
- Diversified Four-Division Revenue Base: Aviation, maritime, real estate, and utilities reduce exposure to single-sector volatility. When maritime containers decline, aviation and real estate can offset.
- Fortress Liquidity: $849.2 million in unrestricted current assets provides 2.2 years of operating expense coverage — well above typical A-rated benchmarks.
- Stable Terminal Operating Agreements: Long-term contracts with SSA Marine, TRAPAC, and other major stevedores provide revenue predictability and operational expertise.
- Flexible Rate-Setting Authority: City Charter grants the Port broad autonomy to set rates and fees for port services without City Council approval (except for bonded borrowing), enabling rapid response to market changes.
- Natural Deepwater Harbor: 50+ feet depth reduces long-term maintenance capital relative to ports requiring continuous dredging.
- Fitch Positive Outlook: Signals potential upgrade to A+/AA range within 12–24 months if current trends hold.
- Environmental Leadership: NorCal ZERO hydrogen hub and ARCHES clean energy designation attract sustainable logistics providers and position the port favorably for future cargo growth as ESG requirements tighten.
Credit Risks
- Container Volume Volatility: CY2024 preliminary ~900K TEUs down 17% from CY2023; recovery depends on Northern California economic health and shipper sentiment toward non-LA gateways.
- Competition from LA/Long Beach: Those ports are 10+ times larger and attract disproportionate carrier investment and service frequency. Container consolidation favors scale.
- Aviation Concentration: ~47% of port revenue from Oakland International Airport creates exposure to airline network decisions, Bay Area economic cycles, and pandemic-like demand shocks.
- California Environmental Compliance Costs: CARB regulations (Zero Emission Vehicle mandates, shore power equipment, drayage truck standards) are capital-intensive. The $53M hydrogen hub is a proactive response but represents ongoing expense pressure.
- Capital Intensity: $163.7M annual capex ($1.4B over 5 years) is substantial and must be supported by operating revenues. Debt service coverage and asset replacement cycles require careful financial planning.
- Seismic Risk: Bay Area location exposes port facilities and airport infrastructure to earthquake damage. Insurance and business continuity planning are critical.
- Labor Actions: ILWU Pacific Coast contract cycles (the next major negotiation is 2027–2028) could disrupt operations and increase labor costs. 2002 and 2014–2015 labor disputes caused extended shutdowns at West Coast ports.
Rating Trajectory
Fitch's Positive outlook is the key signal. A rating upgrade to A+/AA (or even AA- by Moody's) would lower the cost of debt and strengthen access to capital markets for the $1.4B capital program. The upgrade hinges on sustained operating margin stability despite container volume headwinds and successful execution of the hydrogen/electrification initiatives without cost overruns.
Entity financial data: Sourced from the port authority's published ACFR, official statements, and EMMA continuing disclosures. Figures reflect reported data as of the fiscal years cited; current figures may differ.
Credit ratings: Referenced from published rating agency reports. Ratings are point-in-time; verify current ratings before reliance.
Operational statistics: Based on port-published cargo volumes, vessel calls, and operational reports. Cargo data is subject to revision.
Governance and organizational information: Based on publicly available port authority enabling legislation, board records, and organizational documents.
Analysis and commentary: DWU Consulting analysis. Port finance is an expanding area of DWU's practice; independent verification of specific figures against primary source documents is recommended.
Changelog
2026-02-23 — Initial publication.